Added tex files to book/

1 files changed, 97 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/book/module2/error.tex b/book/module2/error.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2646dc8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/book/module2/error.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+\section{Errors in Numerical
+Computations}\label{errors-in-numerical-computations}
+
+In any numerical method, \textbf{error} is inevitable. Understanding
+\textbf{what kinds of errors occur} and \textbf{why} is essential to
+building reliable and accurate computations.
+
+We mainly classify errors into two major types: - Truncation Error -
+Round-off Error
+
+\subsection{What is Error?}\label{what-is-error}
+
+Let's remind ourselves what error is: \[
+\text{Error} = \text{True Value} - \text{Approximate Value}
+\] However, often the \textbf{true value} is unknown, so we focus on
+\textbf{reducing} and \textbf{analyzing} different types of errors
+instead of eliminating them completely. This can be done by using
+relative error when using iterative methods and is calculated as
+follows: \[
+\text{Relative Error} = \frac{\text{Best} - \text{Second to best}}{Best}
+\]
+
+\subsection{Truncation Error}\label{truncation-error}
+
+Truncation error occurs \textbf{when an infinite process is approximated
+by a finite process}.\\
+In simple terms, it happens \textbf{when you cut off or ``truncate''
+part of the computation}. An example of this could be using a finite
+number of terms from a Taylor Series expansion to approximate a
+function.
+
+Approximating \(e^x\) by the first few terms of its Taylor series:
+
+\[e^x \approx 1 + x + \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^3}{3!}​\]
+
+The error comes from \textbf{neglecting} all the higher order terms
+(\(\frac{x^4}{4!}, \frac{x^5}{5!}\), \ldots).
+
+Truncation error occurs when using numerical methods such as
+approximating and calculating derivatives and integrals. A
+representation of the truncation error is show in the figure below.
+Using our numerical methods we are left if some degree of error.
+
+\begin{figure}
+\centering
+\includegraphics{figures/truncationError.png}
+\caption{Representation of truncation error under a curve}
+\end{figure}
+
+In order to reduce truncation error there are a few things we can do: -
+Include more terms (higher-order methods) - Decrease step sizes (e.g.,
+smaller \(\Delta x\) in approximations) - Use better approximation
+algorithms.
+
+\subsection{Round-off Error}\label{round-off-error}
+
+Round-off error is caused by \textbf{the limited precision} with which
+computers represent numbers. Since computers cannot store an infinite
+number of digits, \textbf{they round off} after a certain number of
+decimal or binary places. For example, instead of representing π with
+infinite decimal places it may be rounded off to approximately 16 digits
+depending on number of bits and the representation of the bits.
+
+In other words, round-off error happens because of how computers store
+numbers. For a double-floating point, the number is stored using
+64-bits. The more bits we use, the more precise of a number we can
+store. However, it makes it costs us more memory making it more
+computational expensive.
+
+While individual round-off errors may seem negligible, their effects can
+\textbf{accumulate over repeated computations}, leading to significant
+inaccuracies. This is particularly problematic in operations such as
+\textbf{subtracting two nearly equal numbers}, where \textbf{loss of
+significance} can occur, severely reducing numerical precision and
+amplifying the impact of round-off error.
+
+\subsubsection{How to Reduce Round-off
+Error:}\label{how-to-reduce-round-off-error}
+
+To reduce round-off error, use higher-precision data types when storing
+numerical values. Additionally, code and algorithms should be structured
+to \textbf{avoid subtracting nearly equal numbers}, a common source of
+significant error. Finally, employing \textbf{numerically stable
+algorithms} is essential for minimizing the accumulation of round-off
+errors during computation.
+
+\subsection{Total Error}\label{total-error}
+
+Truncation and round-off error are inversely proportional, meaning that
+if we decrease one, the other increases. If we want to minimize total
+error we must find the optimal point between step size and error.
+
+\begin{figure}
+\centering
+\includegraphics{figures/totalError.png}
+\caption{Total Error}
+\end{figure}